Ordell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
— Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Bandera County of burglary, and his punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary.
The indictment charged that the burglarized house was “occupied by A. Meadows.” Appellant moved to quash the indictment for the reason that the house was not sufficiently described and that an allegation that such house was “occupied by” was not sufficient. In our opinion appellant was wrong. Pyland v. State, 33 Texas Crim. Rep. 382; Scroggins v. State, 36 Texas Crim. Rep. 117; Hasley v. State, 87 Texas Crim. Rep. 444. In his Criminal Forms…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Pyland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Hesley Jr. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Powers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Powers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929