Legal Opinion
Von Hennig v. Clark
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.
Motion made on special appearance by the Attorney General of the United States to set aside the service of the summons and complaint is granted on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter or person of the defendant, Tom C. Clark, as Attorney General of the United States.
Plaintiffs bring this action to settle their accounts as voting-trustees, under a voting trust which expired in December, 1946, and to secure a discharge before distributing or issuing new stock certificates. Heretofore the Alien Property Custodian had vested 50% of the stock of the defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Kahn v. GarvanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- Stern v. NewtonNew York Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- Special Pros. of NY v. United States Atty. for SDNYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Brown v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- von Hennig v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948