Gusky v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Senior Judge FRIEDMAN.
I respectfully dissent. I do not agree that Amy Gusky (Claimant) is ineligible for benefits.
Claimant was employed by the Steel Valley School District (Employer) as a full-time chemistry teacher working thirty-eight hours per week from August 24, *3212009, until Claimant’s last day of work on June 8, 2011. Although Claimant continued to receive wages until August 19, 2011, I believe that Claimant was unemployed effective June 8, 2011, and eligible for benefits through September 3, 2011, pursuant to section 402.1 of the Unemployment Compensation Law…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Partridge v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- School District v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984