Legal Opinion

Jurco v. Stuart

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 19, 1982No. 82-1158PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

The trial court entered a temporary restraining order. The defendant claims that the temporary restraining order was allowed to ripen into a preliminary injunction without holding an evidentiary hearing. This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to dissolve the order. An additional issue on appeal is whether the court erred by not requiring the plaintiff to post bond.

The plaintiff, Idilia L. Jurco, and the defendant, Robert Stuart, are the sole shareholders and are directors of a corporation known as Enjoyable Eating, Inc. (Enjoyable). Enjoyable operates a restaurant under the name of Cl…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bohn Aluminum & Brass Co. v. BarkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. City of Chicago v. Airline Canteen Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Kable Printing Co. v. Mount Morris Bookbinders Union Local 65-B Graphic Arts International UnionIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Paddington Corp. v. Foremost Sales Promotions, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. People ex rel. Pollution Control Board v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Stanton v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Council 31 v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Abdulhafedh v. Secretary of StateAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API