Legal Opinion

Harrigan v. Marvell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is an appeal from a final decree entered upon a bill in equity brought under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 228, § 5, as appearing in St. 1937, c. 406, § 1, ordering the executor to appear and defend a pending action of tort which had been commenced against his testator during his lifetime. The judge made findings of fact and the evidence is reported.

Some of the facts are undisputed and others we find for ourselves. The plaintiff on September 22, 1942, commenced an action of tort to recover damages for alleged malpractice by the original defendant, a physician, who died testate on June 12, 1945.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Hartmann v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. AroothMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. In re the Estate of GrabowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API