Legal Opinion

Klayman v. Putter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 26, 1935No. 23980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiffs leased a store building to three persons for one year under a written contract. In paragraph 3 of the contract it was provided that the lessees would “keep and maintain all portions of the building let to him by the terms of this contract in as good state of repair as the same are turned over to him, natural tear and wear alone excepted.” In paragraph 9 of the contract it is provided that:

“Said tenants shall further have the use and benefit of and occupancy of all of the store fixtures now within the said store…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. Hazelwood Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Western National Bank v. GersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schimmelfennig v. Grove Farm Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Creekmore v. Redman Industries, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API