Legal Opinion

Battle v. . Coit

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1863PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion delivered by Mr. Justice GREEN, in the Supreme Court (19 Barb., 68), states correctly the principles of law applicable to this case. It is a maxim of the law that the incident shall pass by the grant of the principal, but not the principal by the grant of the incident. The sale by Battle, to his copartners, of his interest in the partnership property, created a debt in his favor, for the price of the property and the drafts which he took were merely the evidences of the debt, and not the debt itself. As between the parties to the sale, the debt was the principal and the drafts the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tobey v. BarberNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. In re ClohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Frisbie v. LarnedNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Hushes v. WheelerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
  5. Burdick v. GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1818

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rukeyser v. Fountain & Choate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  2. Fitch v. . McDowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Landauer v. EspenhainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Miller v. ReynoldsNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  5. McLean v. GriotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API