Legal Opinion

Hines v. Snell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1921No. 12056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Sandersville — Judge Jordan. December 11, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. Where a legal and pertinent request for a charge has been properly made, it is the duty of the judge to give it in such manner that the jury will distinctly understand that it has the sanction and approval of the court as a correct statement of the legal *93proposition (Ga. R. Co. v. Flowers, 108 Ga. 795, 33 S. E. 874; Blandon v. State, 6 Ga. App. 782 (3), 65 S. E. 842); and it would be improper for the judge to weaken the effect of such a requested instruction by any act or words that might ereate an impression upon their minds that the charge is given, not as his own interpretation-of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ullman v. Brunswick Title Guarantee & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Blandon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. DeVane v. DeVaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  5. Leaptrot v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Davis v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API