In re Nicholas GG.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPeters, J.
We agree with the majority that respondent Elaine GG. (hereinafter respondent) was not denied the effective assistance of counsel at the fact-finding phase of this proceeding for the reasons stated but would further find that respondent failed to demonstrate that she was deprived of “meaningful representation [at the dispositional phase] and that she suffered actual prejudice as the result of the claimed deficiencies” (Matter of Matthew C., 227 AD2d 679, 682-683 [emphasis supplied]; see, Matter of Dingman v Purdy, 221 AD2d 817).
In matters of this kind, the standard to determine whether a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- In re Matthew C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Dingman v. PurdyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re James R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Lewis v. DeBuonoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.