Legal Opinion

State v. Fenske

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1936No. 33,040PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action in which the defendants, Henry Fenske and John Boyd, were charged with felonies in two counts. The first count charged burglary and the second count grand larceny of a female coon dog. The action against Fenske is still pending. Boyd was acquitted on the first count and convicted of petit larceny on the second count, and from that conviction he appeals.

Appellant first contends his demurrer to the state’s evidence should have been sustained. In support of this complaint he urges that since the dog was not listed and valued…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. In re BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. State v. O'KaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Harrington v. MilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. State v. GranvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mayfield v. BethardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. Scharfeld v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  4. Burgess v. Shampooch Pet Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. Scharfeld v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API