Legal Opinion

Sheridan Associates, Inc. v. Coffey

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for judgment declaring that it has the absolute right to an order of eviction and to recover possession of commercial and business space now occupied by defendants, upon the ground that it desires to withdraw the space permanently from the rental market. At the commencement of the trial, the action was discontinued against Diana Coffey, Paul Cohen, Retired Postal Employees Association, Inc., S. Kivowitz Sons, Inc., Aaron Herschbain and Jack P. Peltz, and Irving Sabo was added as a party defendant. Plaintiff acquired possession by long-term leases of the entire…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Loab Estates, Inc. v. DruheNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Suppus v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. New York University v. Temporary State Housing Rent CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Matter of Wong v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 1010 Third Avenue Realty Corp. v. Leo-Ad Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Harmor Operating Co. v. Vent-O-Matic Incinerator Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API