Legal Opinion

Monrose, Inc. v. Baldridge

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 10, 1982No. 82-554PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of the lower court’s order granting summary judgment to appellees.

*468Appellees wanted to sell their leasehold interest and gave appellant, a real estate broker, the exclusive right to sell for an express period of time. Under the written agreement, when the term expired, a 90-day “protection period” for the appellant sprang into effect. The pertinent provision provided:

Such compensation shall be paid if property is sold, conveyed, or otherwise transferred within 90 days after termination of this authority or any extension thereof to anyone with whom Broker has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estes v. MoylanSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Dancy v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. State v. LahiffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  4. Chapman v. TisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Sanson v. Dutcher, Higginbotham & Bass, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Venturvest Realty Corporation v. Aksip Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. WTSP-TV, Inc. v. Number One Realty Center, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API