Legal Opinion

H. J. Heinz Co. v. Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1952No. Appeal, 125PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Equity will enjoin taxation for want of power to tax. Jamison C. & C. Co. v. Unity Twsp. Sch. Dist., 362 Pa. 389, 66 A. 2d 759, especially where as here, the provision for an appeal in a city ordinance fails to provide an adequate remedy for contesting the assessment. Alleging lack of authority to tax, the plaintiff in this equity proceeding sought to restrain the collec tion of an additional mercantile license tax over and above an amount admittedly due, under an assessment by the City of Pittsburgh for the year 1950. The lower court sustained preliminary objections raised…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blauner's, Inc. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Norris Bros. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  3. Jamison Coal & Coke Co. v. Unity Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Commonwealth v. VetterleinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Commonwealth v. Thackara Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fischer v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Fischer v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Crawford v. Southern Fulton School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Glendale Heights Ownership Ass'n v. Glenolden Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Isaly Dairy Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API