Legal Opinion

Rich v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 13, 1897No. 1570PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Anderson. Tried below before Hon. John F. Watts, County Judge. Appeal from a conviction for betting upon the result of a public election; penalty, a fine of $25. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HEEDERSOH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of betting on the result of a public election and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25; hence this appeal.

The statement of facts is as follows: Dick Wright testified for the State: “My name is Dick Wright. I know the defendant, Abe Rich. I did not bet with him on the election. I did agree to bet $25 with Abe Rich in Anderson County, Texas, on the result of a public election to he held in the city of Palestine on the 6th day of April, 1897, and put up $5 of the money, and agreed to put the balance in the stakeholder’s hands by 12 o’clock that day,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stearnes v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. State v. WelchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
  3. Martin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coulter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. McCleskey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1948
  4. Windsor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API