Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burke v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1956Published

1DissentFroessel, J.

I fully concur in the opinion of Judge Dye. There can be no dispute about the fact that the duty to repair is imposed by law both upon the city and the trustees. In the case of the city, it is the common law; in the case of the trustees, it is section 178 of the Railroad Law. Such an obligation to repair is not synonymous with an obligation to indemnify.

City of Brooklyn v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co. (47 N. Y. 475) is not apt, for in that case the company had given a bond and a contract to the city, by which it “in effect contracts to perform that duty to the public in the place and stead of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. City of Brooklyn v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Schuster v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API