Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Lykken

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1992No. 17478Published

1DissentSabers, Justice

A review of the appeal record reveals a jurisdictional defect which is controlling. The time to file a motion for new trial is jurisdictional. SDCL 23A-32-15 provides in part:

An appeal from the judgment must be taken within thirty days after the judgment is signed, attested and filed.

The running of the time for filing a notice of appeal is terminated by a timely motion [for new trial]....

(emphasis added). SDCL 23A-29-1, which governs motions for new trial in criminal actions, provides in part:

A motion for new trial ... shall be served and filed not later than ten days after filing of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HareSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. WatersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API