Rea v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.
The Attorney-General has moved to dismiss the writ of error in this case upon the ground that it does not affirmatively appear from the record that the bills *715of exceptions were signed by the judge of the trial court within sixty days from the date of the final judgment as prescribed by law. This motion is sustained, as the record before us shows that the fact suggested is true. Kelly v. Trehy, 133 Va. 160, 112 S. E. 757; James v. Commonwealth, 133 Va. 723, 112 S. E. 761.
We observe further from the record which is relied upon that the assignments of error are insufficient. Puckett v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kelly v. TrehySupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Puckett v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pembroke Limestone Works v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Morris v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Carleson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
- Timmons v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928