Legal Opinion

United States v. Driscoll

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 15, 1869PublishedCited by 7 opinions

[This was an indictment against John T. Driscoll for embezzling and destroying letters.]

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

The defendant is an errand-boy employed by the firm of Hal-let & Davis, of Boston, whose duty required him to take from the post-office all letters arriving by mail to the address of his employers. He has been convicted of having embezzled or destroyed two such letters so received by him, one containing, and one not containing, an article of value. The two indictments are framed under two clauses of section 22 of the act of 3d of March, 1825 (4 Stat. 108). By the first clause, it is made penal for any person to take the mail, or any letter or packet therefrom, or from…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. MaxwellDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
  2. United States v. McCreadyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1882
  3. Ex parte PetersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1880
  4. In re BurkhardtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1887
  5. United States v. BurlingtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API