Irving Weinberg Dress Co. v. Goldsticker
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
In this action to recover for goods sold and delivered the defendant at the time of answering demanded a bill of particulars without specifying any particular items, and in accordance with the demand a bill of particulars was served and accepted. •
December 23, 1925, about a month after the service of the bill, the cause appeared on the day calendar pursuant to notice of trial.
The day before the case was set for trial an adjournment was requested of plaintiff’s, attorney; he refused to grant the request and stated that plaintiff would proceed to trial on the following morning.'
As plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ritz Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co. v. DitmarsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Oakley v. CokaleteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Oakley v. CokaleteNew York Supreme Court · 1897
- Van Kleeck v. NicholsNew York Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by2 opinions
- Esposito v. National Transportation Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1931
- Warren v. BoehmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932