Mitchnick v. Fishman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.
Defendants move under rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint in an action to recover moneys advanced to finance a marriage and a medical career. They contend that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for fraud, and with this contention the court must agree.
The alleged fraud consists of representations that the defendant Irwin Fishman was (1) “ a medical student with one year remaining to completion of his said medical studies ” and (2) “ physically and mentally fit and able to enter into and carry out the functions and duties…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Banner v. Lyon & Healy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Banner v. Lyon Healy, Inc., FreemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Cohen v. KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Stein v. WassermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940