Legal Opinion
Cannon v. Hirsch Law Office, P.C.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 14, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 08-0283PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Sylvia Cannon (“Cannon”) appeals the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment in favor of Lawrence Hirsch (“Hirsch”). The trial court found that Cannon’s legal malpractice claim was barred by the two-year statute of limitations. For the reasons that follow, we find that genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment on the issue of whether Cannon’s malpractice claim was filed before the two-year statute of limitations had run, and thus we reverse and remand.
Facts and Procedural History
¶ 2 In May 2004 Cannon retained Hirsch to protect her…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Doe v. RoeArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Schunck v. Santos (In Re Santos)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Ryan v. San Francisco Peaks Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Moon v. McDonald, Carano & Wilson, L.L.P.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- TDB Tucson Group, L.L.C. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- City of Tempe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.