Sternbach v. Friedman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Morris Sternbach, as administrator, etc.,, of Philip Sternbach, deceased, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, bearing date the 19th-. day of August, 1901, and entered in the office of the clerk of the-county of New York, upon the report of a referee, as adjudges that the defendant Yette Friedman has been exonerated, to the extent of the value of certain whisky certificates on the 27th day of May, 1896, from her…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the plaintiff, Morris Sternbach, as administrator, etc.,, of Philip Sternbach, deceased, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, bearing date the 19th-. day of August, 1901, and entered in the office of the clerk of the-county of New York, upon the report of a referee, as adjudges that the defendant Yette Friedman has been exonerated, to the extent of the value of certain whisky certificates on the 27th day of May, 1896, from her liability on or by virtue of the bond and mortgage mentioned in the said judgment, and further in so far as the said…
1Opinion of the Court
Vam Brunt, P. J.:
This is an appeal from a final judgment of foreclosure and sale, of mortgaged premises in the city of New York. The rights of the parties were declared and settled by this court on a former appeal (34 App. Div. 534). It was then held that the defendant Friedman was entitled to offset' against her liability upon the bond to which the mortgage was collateral, the value of certain whisky certificates, and that to the extent of the value of such certificates on the 27th day of May, 1896, she was exonerated from liability on or by virtue of the bond and mortgage. The mortgage was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sternbach v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898