Tietjen v. United States Veteran's Administration
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MUECKE, District Judge.
Having considered Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss/Motion For Summary Judgment, filed February 1, 1988; the response and reply thereto; and the parties supplemental briefs, 1 this Court finds and concludes as follows:
In this case plaintiff alleges that the Veterans Administration (VA) deprived him of due process by reducing his benefits. Plaintiff argues that the VA violated its regulations in applying Circular 21-80-7. According to plaintiff, these infractions violate the due process clause of the fifth amendment. Thus, plaintiff requests injunctive relief;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- William H. Tietjen v. United States Veterans Administration Thomas K. Turnage, Administrator of Veteran's AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n v. Veterans' AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Quarles v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Larry E. Belton, Sr. v. The Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997