Legal Opinion

Tietjen v. United States Veteran's Administration

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 18, 1988No. CIV 87-1789 PHX CAMPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MUECKE, District Judge.

Having considered Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss/Motion For Summary Judgment, filed February 1, 1988; the response and reply thereto; and the parties supplemental briefs, 1 this Court finds and concludes as follows:

In this case plaintiff alleges that the Veterans Administration (VA) deprived him of due process by reducing his benefits. Plaintiff argues that the VA violated its regulations in applying Circular 21-80-7. According to plaintiff, these infractions violate the due process clause of the fifth amendment. Thus, plaintiff requests injunctive relief;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. William H. Tietjen v. United States Veterans Administration Thomas K. Turnage, Administrator of Veteran's AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n v. Veterans' AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  3. Quarles v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  4. Larry E. Belton, Sr. v. The Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API