Legal Opinion
United States v. Manhattan Brush Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 13, 1965PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge.
The defendants move for an order directing the United States Attorney to furnish the defendants “with all evidence in his possession or under his control which is favorable to the defendants or which would tend to exculpate the defendants”. In his affidavit in support of the motion defense counsel asks inter alia for:(a) Names and statements of witnesses.
'(b) Summaries of witnesses interviews.(e) Documents.(d) Tests conducted by the Navy and others of the paint brushes in question.
The motion is made on the authority of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Ralph F. DeleoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Seymour Pollack, United States of America v. Paul M. Sachs, United States of America v. William CuddCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Milton M. Levin v. Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- United States v. SklaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
- United States v. AverellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.