Legal Opinion
Wirth v. Kuehn
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 2, 1906PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.
The defendant is the executrix of the will of Max Nold, and this action is brought to recover $1,140 for board alleged to have been furnished by the plaintiff to said Nold and his wife, and various sums of money, amounting to over $1,400, alleged to have been received by Nold from the plaintiff or to have been paid by the plaintiff for his use. The case was tried before a judge of the Superior Court without a jury, the only evidence being an auditor’s report, which set forth his findings of fact in detail as to all claims made by the plaintiff.
The defendant asked the judge to rule that upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kirchgassner v. RodickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Livingston v. HammondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Emerson v. PatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Peaslee v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Spring v. HulettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Fisher v. DoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Smith v. KnappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- South Lancaster Academy v. Inhabitants of LancasterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Beers v. WardwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.