Legal Opinion

Di Giovacchini v. Teich

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 16, 1943No. Docket 138/218PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The endeavor of the complainant in the prosecution of this cause is to foreclose her mortgage with an adjudication of its superiority over the mortgage encumbrance acquired by the defendant. The involvement emanates from the following procession of events:

On May 20th, 1913, a bond and accompanying mortgage encumbering the premises situate in the Township of Ewing, Mercer County, were executed and delivered by the owners, Sallie and Peter Van Fleet, to the Standard Fire Insurance Company to evidence and secure an indebtedness of $2,200. On December 1st, 1919, the mortgaged premises were…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StevensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  2. Crown Fabrics Corp. v. Northern Assur. Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  3. Atwood v. CarmerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
  4. Magie v. ReynoldsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1893
  5. Henion v. MonahanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Notch View Associates v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  2. Openshaw v. OpenshawUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. SD Walker, Inc. v. Brigantine Beach Hotel Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Atlantic Seaboard Co. v. Borough of Seaside ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Atlantic Seaboard Co. v. Borough of Seaside ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API