Legal Opinion

State v. Andes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 19, 1990No. 8910232; CA A61742PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Defendant appeals his DUII conviction. ORS 813.010. An officer arrested him after he failed field sobriety tests. Thereafter, the officer administered a breath test, using an Intoxilyzer Model 4011A. It showed that defendant had a .20 blood alcohol level. After trial to a jury, defendant was convicted. We affirm.

Defendant assigns as error that the court denied his motion to require the state to disclose information in its possession of all instances relating to the operation of the Intoxilyzer Model 4011A when an individual took multiple tests and the results varied, when there was a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. LundbomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. McKendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. City of EuporaMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. LycksellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API