Legal Opinion
Grossheim v. Associated Truck Lines, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 14, 1989No. Docket 110781PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant Associated Truck Lines (atl) appeals as of right from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). We affirm.
Plaintiff is a Michigan resident employed by atl, a foreign corporation. Plaintiff was injured in Ohio while operating a truck owned by atl. The truck was registered in Illinois and was not insured under Michigan’s no-fault act.
At the time of plaintiff’s injury, MCL 500.3102(1); MSA 24.13102(1) provided:
A nonresident owner or registrant of a motor vehicle not registered in this state shall not operate or permit the vehicle to be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Liddell v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Darnell v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Griggs v. Saginaw & Flint Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berryman v. K Mart Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Davis v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jackson County Drain Commissioner v. Village of StockbridgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Davis v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Grossheim v. Associated Truck Lines, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.