Goodbody v. Margiotti

Defendant in this case presents a petition for reargument of the question as to whether the alleged agreement between the parties of July 8, 1931, was without consideration on his part and therefore unenforceable. The facts are set forth in the opinion reported in 323 Pa. 529.

It is urged that consideration for the agreement may be predicated upon (1) defendant's waiver of a claim for approximately $2,000 damages caused by the decline in the value of his securities from the opening of the market on July 8 until the alleged agreement was made in the afternoon of that day; or (2), defendant's…