Legal Opinion

Hill v. Whiteside

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 12, 1988No. 2-85-272-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

From a judgment for plaintiffs-appellees, Clyde E. Whiteside and Clarice Whiteside (Whitesides), in their trespass to try title suit against appellants, Homer Hill and Doretta Hill (Hills), this appeal is brought. Appellants raise eight points of error, based upon misplacing the burden of proof, legal and factual insufficiency of evidence, erroneous partial striking of pleadings and erroneously excluded evidence.

We affirm.

In setting out the relevant facts in the case, we will borrow liberally from the fact statement contained in the Hills’ brief.

Appellants own certain lands located in…

3Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Hardin v. HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Larson v. Cook Consultants, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Vista Chevrolet, Inc. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. TH Investments, Inc. v. Kirby Inland Marine, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  2. Dixon v. Dewhurst, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  3. City of Victoria v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Millar v. BowieCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. TH Investments Inc v. Kirby Inland Marine L.P. and Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API