Legal Opinion

State v. Walburt

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1967No. 8348PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPIESS, Chief Judge, Court of Appeals.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s pro se motion to vacate judgment and sentence filed pursuant to Rule 93, § 21-1-1(93) N.M.S.A.1953. Appellant was charged by information in two counts with the crime of forgery.

Upon arraignment and being represented by counsel he entered a plea of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. By means of a motion filed in the proceedings prior to trial appellant informed the court that he was without sufficient funds to obtain a psychiatric examination so as to establish his defense of insanity…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Smith v. BaldiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. State v. MoserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. United States v. HelwigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  4. State v. DalrympleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Bobby Ray Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BotelloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. State v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. McCainNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. State v. ByrdNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API