Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States v. Foster

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1936No. 6 Div. 890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

“Suit by Herbert Foster, suing by next friend, against the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States,- upon-a group policy of insurance, entered into-by the appellant with the Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Company, wherein -the employees of said company were insured under the terms of said group policy against total and permanent disability by reason of bodily injury or disease.
“The plaintiff was an employee of said Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Company while said group policy was in force, and, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the policy, was insured…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. DorrietySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BrownAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BrownAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API