Legal Opinion · Dissent

Auto-Owners Insurance v. Karan, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 31, 2005No. A04A1832Published

1DissentBarnes, Judge

Because I believe that the trial court properly denied summary judgment, finding that questions of fact remained regarding Karan’s compliance with the policy’s notice provision, I must respectfully dissent.

On or about May 23,2002, Philip Richardson fell and was injured at a Sleep Inn Motel which is owned by Karan. Richardson notified Karan of his claim, and Karan, in turn, contacted Auto-Owners. Auto-Owners investigated the claim, and determined that “[Karan] in no way contributed to [Richardson’s] injuries,” and declined to consider any settlement offers. Richardson filed a personal injury…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Waldroup v. Greene County Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. PinyanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. CumbaaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Oden v. Legacy Ford-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Rapid Taxi Co. v. BroughtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API