Legal Opinion

(HC)Singh v. Pfeiffer

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 3, 2021No. 2:21-cv-01731Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAGHVENDRA SINGH, Case No. 2:21-cv-01731-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS 13 v. ACTION 14 C. PFEIFFER, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR 15 Respondent. URGENT RELEASE BE DENIED 16 ECF No. 9 17 18 Petitioner filed a habeas petition under section 2254 on September 22, 2021. ECF No. 1. 19 After screening that petition, I found that it did not state a cognizable claim and offered petitioner 20 a chance to amend. ECF No. 8. As of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Brunner v. Ohio Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Oscar Archie Clifton v. Attorney General of the State of California Board of Prison TermsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Talbert L. McClendon v. Clarence E. Trigg, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API