Legal Opinion

Malague v. Marion

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 13, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By this bill the complainant seeks the partition (or sale) of property known as 227 Spruce street, Bloomfield, New Jersey. The complainant Catherine Malague claims to be seized of an undivided one-half interest in said premises subject to the right of curtesy of the defendant John F. Marion, and, also, that the defendant Margaret Ungemah is seized of an undivided one-half interest therein, subject to the right of curtesy of the defendant Marion. The defendant Marion, on the other hand, claims to be the sole owner of the premises and denies the right of the complainants to maintain this bill.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Twp. of Lodi v. Little Ferry Nat. BankNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  2. Stabel v. GertelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Anderson v. GreenleafSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API