Legal Opinion
Lazarov v. Klyce
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1953PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor
The bill in this cause was filed in the Chancery Court of Shelby County, to secure a decree for the balance of the indebtedness on a certain promissory note, made a part of the bill, upon which the complainant was the payee, and the defendant one of the makers.
The signatory part of the note, out of which the controversy arises, is as follows:
“Independent Tool & Machine Co.
“By J. W. Clements “Arnold. Klyce”
The bill was filed to secure a decree against Arnold Klyce individually, and his defense is that the note is an obligation of the Independent Tool & Machine Company; that Klyce signed the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Coal River Collieries v. Eureka Coal & Wood Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Way v. Lyric Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Farmers State Bank of Newport v. LamonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Toon v. McCawWashington Supreme Court · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Continental Bankers Life Insurance Co. of the South v. Bank of AlamoTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- 84 Lumber Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- First State Bank of Wayne County, Kentucky (Formerly City and County Bank of Wayne County) v. The City and County Bank of Knox County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Bill Walker & Associates, Inc. v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bernard E. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.