Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Beebe v. Wilkins

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petition, signed by twenty-two legal voters and filed September 2, 1889, for the abatement of a liquor nuisance in Fitzwilliam. The solicitor has not had charge of the case, and does not appear. There has been no trial. At this term Beebe and three other petitioners declined to prosecute further, and by leave of court withdrew their names from the petition. Thereupon the defendant moved that the petition be dismissed.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

By s. 1, c. 77, Laws 1887, “Any building, place, or

tenément in any town or city that is resorted to for prostitution, lewdness, or illegal gaming, or that is used for the illegal sale or keeping for sale of spirituous or malt liquors, wine, or cider, is declared to be a common nuisance.” Section 2 provides that the supreme court shall have jurisdiction in equity, upon information filed by the solicitor for the county, or upon petition of not less than twenty legal voters of such town or city, setting forth any of the facts contained in s. 1 of this act, to restrain, enjoin, or abate the same,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Clarke v. MathewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Morgan's Heirs v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  4. Dunn v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1834

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hyde v. LynchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
  2. In Re the Impeachment of BevinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1925
  3. St. Lawrence Independent School Dist. v. Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API