Legal Opinion

Callister v. Ingersoll-Rand Financial Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1982No. 81-2526PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

In January, this court notified the parties that it was considering summary dismissal of this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Both sides have responded. After due consideration, we have determined that we are without jurisdiction over the instant appeal, and so order it dismissed.

This is an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. In the Matter of Arlan's Department Stores, Inc., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. In the Matter of Jonathan Kutner, Debtors. Daniel C. Stewart v. Jonathan KutnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. In Re CallisterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nicholas and Virginia Maiorino v. Branford Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. In Re CallisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. Matter of Seven Springs Apartments, Phase IIUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
  4. Wilson Freight Co. v. Citibank, N. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  5. In Re GraceyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API