People v. Ballinger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*932The defendant’s contention that his waiver of the right to a jury trial was inadequate is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Torres, 24 AD3d 692, 692 [2005]). In any event, the record establishes that the defendant’s waiver was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary (see People v Torres, 24 AD3d at 692; People v Hinton, 6 AD3d 724, 724 [2004]; People v Solouzo, 235 AD2d 439, 439 [1997]).
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that his conviction of burglary in the third degree in the State of Connecticut did not qualify as a predicate New…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. SammsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. MunizNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. BostonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. BurgosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. FloresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. RovinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. SalakoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.