Legal Opinion

Snell v. Watts

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1959No. File 9724PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In this action Gertrude Snell, as plaintiff, seeks to recover damages from the defendants Emerson Watts and M. Peterson Watts, copartners, doing business as the Thermal Service & Construction Company, for breach of a contract whereby defendants agreed to remodel plaintiff’s Onida, South Dakota, home. Defendant Emerson Watts was not served with process and did not appear in the action. The answer of M. Peterson Watts specifically denied the partnership and the use of the name Thermal Service & Construction Company and generally denied all of the allegations of the complaint. At the close of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hansen v. IsaakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Waggoner v. Midwestern Development, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Insurance Agents, Inc. v. ZimmermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ebert v. FORT PIERRE MOOSE LODGE 1813South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Corey v. KocerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Smith v. HalversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API