Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*446The verdict finding defendants strictly liable for the dog-bite injuries sustained by the infant plaintiffs is not supported by evidence sufficient to establish that Officer Smith knew or should have known of the dog’s vicious propensities (see Petrone v Fernandez, 12 NY3d 546, 550 [2009]). In the very brief time he spent with the abandoned dog, Smith observed that the dog was friendly, playful, and “rambunctious.” Further, Smith saw plaintiff petting the dog and did not see the dog growling or lunging at any time. Indeed, plaintiff testified that the dog was playful and friendly, both to her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Petrone v. FernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Bukhatetsky v. VysotskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Phillips v. Coffee To Go., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mercado v. OvalleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Orozco v. 725 S. Blvd., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Mercado v. OvalleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API