Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Chicken, 1090866 (Ala. 4-15-2011)
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 15, 2011No. 1090866PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Justice.
Tyson Chicken, Inc. (“Tyson”), petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Etowah Circuit Court to transfer the worker’s compensation action brought by Anna Ruth Guyton to the Marshall Circuit Court where, it- says, venue is proper.
*2 Facts and Procedural History
The facts of this case, as described by Tyson, are undisputed. Guyton, who lived in Etowah County, was an employee of Tyson’s at its production facility in Marshall County. On August 5, 2009, she was apparently injured on the job, and she subsequently filed a claim for worker’s compensation benefits on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Ex Parte Integon Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte American Resources Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tinney v. East Alabama Medical CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- Hennis v. R.E. Garrison Trucking, Inc. (In re R.E. Garrison Trucking, Inc.)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
- Ex parte Honda Manufacturing and Development of Alabama, LLC PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUSCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2023
- In re: Tim Cloud v. Continental Roofing Company, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2026