Legal Opinion

Luce v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The plaintiff contends that the appellant, as surety on the guardian’s bond, is liable for all defaults of the guardian, regardless of when such defaults occurred. The appellant contends that, since the bond was furnished in connection with the proceedings for the sale of the ward’s real estate, liability under the bond is limited tO’ a proper accounting for the proceeds received from such sale. If the obligation of the bond in question is general and covers the entire period of the guardianship, the appellant would be concluded by the judgment entered in the county court. Clark v. Sloan *54(1934…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heller v. ShapiroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Thompson v. DekumOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Clark v. SloanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Brehm v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Rudolf v. MaloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NY v. First Nat. Bank in Ft. LeeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
  2. Hotel Wausau Co. v. Banking CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API