Legal Opinion

Foster v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1937No. 8220PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner, as executrix of the last will of her deceased husband, Chapman Foster, seeks reversal of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals which sustained a determination by respondent, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, that there was a deficiency of $1,119 in respect of the -estate tax imposed on Chapman Foster’s estate by title III (sections 300-325) of the Revenue Act of 1926, 44 Stat. 69-87.

Chapman Foster (hereinafter called decedent) died on March ,16, 1931. At the time of his death he and petitioner held as joint tenants real estate of the value of $203,815,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Phillips v. Dime Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. O'SHAUGHNESSY v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sheets v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. McGrew's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. Lilly v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  4. Agnes J. Tuck, as of the Estate of George A. Tuck, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Estate of Silvester v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API