Legal Opinion

Armitage, Exr. v. Ulrich

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1946No. Appeal, 21PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

The plaintiff-executor found among decedent’s papers a judgment note, under seal, dated June 2, 1930, for $1000, payable five years after date. It was signed by defendant, who admits she received the money. Decedent died in 1844, i. e., nine years after maturity of the note. Judgment having been confessed on the note, defendant moved to open on the ground of actual payment, and upon the presumption of the fact of payment. After depositions and argument her rule, was discharged and she appeals.

As to presumption of the fact of payment, defendant relied upon a showing of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. WelshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Drob v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Volkwein v. Volkwein, Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Commonwealth v. MeyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Lorenzo v. RinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donsavage EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Psinakis v. PsinakisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Kincaid v. Neil, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API