Legal Opinion

Hise v. Romeo Stores Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 5, 1921No. 9917PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action for damages because of the alleged failure of warranty of the variety of seed potatoes. Judgment for defendant. Error to the District Court of Conejos County, Hon. Jesse C. Wiley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

The parties plaintiff and defendant in the trial court occupy the same relative position here. Plaintiff, a farmer, bought of defendant, a dealer, approximately 10,000 pounds of potatoes, advertised, sold, and purchased as “early Ohio seed potatoes.” Plaintiff knew at the time that said potatoes were not then in defendant’s possession, but were to be shipped to it from a grower in an adjoining county. The price was $228 of which sum $200 was paid prior to *250delivery. The potatoes were delivered, planted, tended, and harvested, whereupon plaintiff, contending that they were not of the variety as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Firth v. RichterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Hallack v. StockdaleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Hoffman v. DixonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mile Hi Concrete, Inc. v. MatzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Yampa Valley Electric Ass'n v. TeleckySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Snook v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. Henderson v. BerceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946
  5. Kramer v. Tone Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API