United States of America Ex Rel. Oscar Walden, Jr. v. Frank J. Pate, Warden, Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet Branch
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KILEY, Circuit Judge.
Walden’s petition under the Habeas Corpus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2241 et seq., dismissed without a hearing by the district court, presents the question whether the exclusionary rule recently announced by the Supreme Court in Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964) must be applied retrospectively.
The petition alleges that Walden was denied access to counsel following his arrest and before his confession to the crime of rape, which was introduced in the 1952 rape trial. A jury convicted him and he was sentenced to seventy-five years’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commonwealth v. NegriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- United States of America Ex Rel. Thomas E. Kemp v. Frank J. Pate, Warden, Illinois State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Whitney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Hyde v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.