Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

S.A.V. v. K.G.V.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1986No. 67189Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWelliver, Judge

In the companion case to this one, the Court amply demonstrates that the historical justification for the doctrine of inter-spousal immunity is no longer justified. When judicially created law becomes unjust after the passage of time, courts can mold the common law to ensure a more fair and equitable administration of justice. In the words of Justice Cardozo, “I think that when a rule, after it has been duly tested by experience, has been found to be inconsistent with the sense of justice or with the social welfare, there should be less hesitation in frank avowal and full abandonment.” B.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Merenoff v. MerenoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Boblitz v. BoblitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Hack v. HackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Hosko v. HoskoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API