Legal Opinion

Oregon Bank v. Baardson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1970PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff bank brought an action to recover on two promissory notes signed by the defendant and Lee Williams as co-makers. The defendant answered alleging that he was an accommodation maker and was discharged from his obligation because the bank impaired collateral given by his comaker, Williams. The only issues were those raised by the answer and a counterclaim. The court directed a verdict for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

Williams makes mobile pellet mills. Such mills process hay into pellets to feed stock. The defendant Baardson sells some of the machinery and equipment ■which is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heintz v. SINNER ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Atckison v. TriplettOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Crimmins v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Peoples Bank of Point Pleasant v. Pied Piper Retreat, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Great Southwest Life Insurance Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Southwest Florida Production v. SchirowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API