Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Packer Corporation

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1931No. 5177Published

1DissentStraup, J.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in the former case, State v. Packer Corporation (Utah) 297 P. 1013, referred to in the prevailing opinion. I admit that substantially the same questions presented and decided in the former case are presented on this appeal. Should the doctrine of stare decisis be applied I, because thereof, would on this appeal now yield my views expressed in the former case and concur in the prevailing opinion on this appeal. I however, think the doctrine not applicable. A petition for a rehearing in the former case was filed but not ruled on until…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Montgomery County Fiscal Court v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Kimball v. Grantsville CityUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Becker v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State v. Packer CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API